| Title |
Effectiveness of music therapy: a summary of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of music interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s61340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroharu Kamioka, Kiichiro Tsutani, Minoru Yamada, Hyuntae Park, Hiroyasu Okuizumi, Koki Tsuruoka, Takuya Honda, Shinpei Okada, Sang-Jun Park, Jun Kitayuguchi, Takafumi Abe, Shuichi Handa, Takuya Oshio, Yoshiteru Mutoh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| El Salvador | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 15% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 500 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 95 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 11% |
| Researcher | 45 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 17% |
| Unknown | 124 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 105 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 25 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 13% |
| Unknown | 142 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#436,899
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#19
of 1,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,716
of 245,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.