↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The oral microbiome and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
The oral microbiome and adverse pregnancy outcomes
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s142730
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles M Cobb, Patricia J Kelly, Karen B Williams, Shilpa Babbar, Mubashir Angolkar, Richard J Derman

Abstract

Significant evidence supports an association between periodontal pathogenic bacteria and preterm birth and preeclampsia. The virulence properties assigned to specific oral pathogenic bacteria, for example, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Filifactor alocis, Campylobacter rectus, and others, render them as potential collaborators in adverse outcomes of pregnancy. Several pathways have been suggested for this association: 1) hematogenous spread (bacteremia) of periodontal pathogens; 2) hematogenous spread of multiple mediators of inflammation that are generated by the host and/or fetal immune response to pathogenic bacteria; and 3) the possibility of oral microbial pathogen transmission, with subsequent colonization, in the vaginal microbiome resulting from sexual practices. As periodontal disease is, for the most part, preventable, the medical and dental public health communities can address intervention strategies to control oral inflammatory disease, lessen the systemic inflammatory burden, and ultimately reduce the potential for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This article reviews the oral, vaginal, and placental microbiomes, considers their potential impact on preterm labor, and the future research needed to confirm or refute this relationship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 85 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 95 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,793,126
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#148
of 784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,682
of 317,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.