↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Impact of laughter on air trapping in severe chronic obstructive lung disease

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Impact of laughter on air trapping in severe chronic obstructive lung disease
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2008
DOI 10.2147/copd.s2204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin H Brutsche, Paul Grossman, Rebekka E Müller, Jan Wiegand, Pello, Florent Baty, Willibald Ruch

Abstract

Static and dynamic hyperinflation is an important factor of exertional dyspnea in patients with severe COPD. This proof-of-concept intervention trial sought to study whether laughter can reduce hyperinflation through repetitive expiratory efforts in patients with severe COPD. For small groups of patients with severe COPD (n = 19) and healthy controls (n = 10) Pello the clown performed a humor intervention triggering regular laughter. Plethysmography was done before and up to 24 hours after intervention. Laughing and smiling were quantified with video-analysis. Real-time breathing pattern was assessed with the LifeShirt, and the psychological impact of the intervention was monitored with self-administered questionnaires. The intervention led to a reduction of TLC in COPD (p = 0.04), but not in controls (p = 0.9). TLC reduction was due to a decline of the residual volume. Four (22 [CI 95% 7 to 46] %) patients were > or = 10% responders. The frequency of smiling and TLC at baseline were independent predictors of TLC response. The humor intervention improved cheerfulness, but not seriousness nor bad mood. In conclusion, smiling induced by a humor intervention was able to reduce hyperinflation in patients with severe COPD. A smiling-derived breathing technique might complement pursed-lips breathing in patients with symptomatic obstruction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Vietnam 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Psychology 15 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#959
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,189
of 95,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.