↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Rosacea and Helicobacter pylori: links and risks

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Rosacea and Helicobacter pylori: links and risks
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s121117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Lazaridou, Chrysovalantis Korfitis, Christina Kemanetzi, Elena Sotiriou, Zoe Apalla, Efstratios Vakirlis, Christina Fotiadou, Aimilios Lallas, Demetrios Ioannides

Abstract

Rosacea is a chronic skin disease characterized by facial erythema and telangiectasia. Despite the fact that many hypotheses have been proposed, its etiology remains unknown. In the present review, the possible link and clinical significance of Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of rosacea are being sought. A PubMed and Google Scholar search was performed using the terms "rosacea", "H.pylori", "gastrointestinal disorders and H.pylori", "microorganisms and rosacea", "pathogenesis and treatment of rosacea", and "risk factors of rosacea", and selected publications were studied and referenced in text. Although a possible pathogenetic link between H. pylori and rosacea is advocated by many authors, evidence is still interpreted differently by others. We conclude that further studies are needed in order to fully elucidate the pathogenesis of rosacea.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Lecturer 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 15 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,343,963
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#382
of 900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,037
of 328,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.