↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Health economics evidence for medical nutrition: are these interventions value for money in integrated care?

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Health economics evidence for medical nutrition: are these interventions value for money in integrated care?
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, May 2014
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s58852
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Walzer, Daniel Droeschel, Mark Nuijten, Hélène Chevrou-Séverac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 9%
Computer Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,699,106
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#256
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,632
of 243,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.