↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Emergency department ultrasound probe infection control: challenges and solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Open access emergency medicine OAEM, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 230)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Emergency department ultrasound probe infection control: challenges and solutions
Published in
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/oaem.s50360
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamid Shokoohi, Paige Armstrong, Ryan Tansek

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (US) has become a cornerstone in the diagnosis and treatment of patients in the emergency department (ED). Despite the beneficial impact on patient care, concern exists over repeat use of probes and the role as a vector for pathogen transmission. US probes are used for various applications, with the level of infection risk, based on the Spaulding Classification, ranging from noncritical with common practice to semicritical with endocavitary probes. To date, the most closely studied organisms are Staphylococcus aureus and human papilloma virus. Current evidence does confirm probe colonization but has not established a causative role in human infection. Based on current literature, US use during invasive procedures remains an infection control concern, but routine use on intact skin does not appear to cause significant risk to patients. Various barrier methods are available, each with indications based on extent of procedure and likelihood of contact with mucosal surfaces. Additionally, chemical cleansing methods have been shown to be effective in limiting probe contamination after use. New technologies utilizing ultraviolet light are available and effective but not widely used in the ED setting. As our understanding of the critical factors in US probe cleaning and disinfection improves, it is important to assess the challenges found in our current practice and to identify potential solutions to improve practices and procedures in infection control across the spectrum of US probe use in various applications in the ED. This article serves as a summary of the current literature available on infection control topics with the utilization of point-of-care US, and discusses challenges and potential solutions to improve the current practice of probe-related infection control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Other 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,602,273
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#9
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,227
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them