| Title |
Predictability of the individual clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for cellulite
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s59851 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai-Uwe Schlaudraff, Maren C Kiessling, Nikolaus BM Császár, Christoph Schmitz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,165,207
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#307
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,750
of 242,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.