↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Exposure to titanium dioxide and other metallic oxide nanoparticles induces cytotoxicity on human neural cells and fibroblasts

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Exposure to titanium dioxide and other metallic oxide nanoparticles induces cytotoxicity on human neural cells and fibroblasts
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2008
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s3234
Pubmed ID
Authors

James C K Lai, Maria B Lai, Sirisha Jandhyam, Vikas V Dukhande, Alok Bhushan, Christopher K Daniels, Solomon W Leung

Abstract

The use of titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) in various industrial applications (eg, production of paper, plastics, cosmetics, and paints) has been expanding thereby increasing the occupational and other environmental exposure of these nanoparticles to humans and other species. However, the health effects of exposure to TiO(2) nanoparticles have not been systematically assessed even though recent studies suggest that such exposure induces inflammatory responses in lung tissue and cells. Because the effects of such nanoparticles on human neural cells are unknown, we have determined the putative cytotoxic effects of these nanoparticles on human astrocytes-like astrocytoma U87 cells and compared their effects on normal human fibroblasts. We found that TiO(2) micro- and nanoparticles induced cell death on both human cell types in a concentration-related manner. We further noted that zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles were the most effective, TiO(2) nanoparticles the second most effective, and magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles the least effective in inducing cell death in U87 cells. The cell death mechanisms underlying the effects of TiO(2) micro- and nanoparticles on U87 cells include apoptosis, necrosis, and possibly apoptosis-like and necrosis-like cell death types. Thus, our findings may have toxicological and other pathophysiological implications on exposure of humans and other mammalian species to metallic oxide nanoparticles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 170 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 24%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 22%
Engineering 16 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Materials Science 14 8%
Chemistry 11 6%
Other 41 23%
Unknown 42 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,127
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,106
of 179,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.