| Title |
Nurse home visits with or without alert buttons versus usual care in the frail elderly: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s38618 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesús Favela, Luis A Castro, Francisco Franco-Marina, Sergio Sánchez-García, Teresa Juárez-Cedillo, Claudia Espinel Bermudez, Julia Mora-Altamirano, Marcela D Rodriguez, Carmen García-Peña |
| Abstract |
To assess whether an intervention based on nurse home visits including alert buttons (NV+AB) is effective in reducing frailty compared to nurse home visits alone (NV-only) and usual care (control group) for older adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 23% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 15% |
| Psychology | 13 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,779
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,412
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#31
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.