↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of World Health Organization and Asia-Pacific body mass index classifications in COPD patients

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1356 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of World Health Organization and Asia-Pacific body mass index classifications in COPD patients
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/copd.s141295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeong Uk Lim, Jae Ha Lee, Ju Sang Kim, Yong Il Hwang, Tae-Hyung Kim, Seong Yong Lim, Kwang Ha Yoo, Ki-Suck Jung, Young Kyoon Kim, Chin Kook Rhee

Abstract

A low body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased mortality and low health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. The Asia-Pacific classification of BMI has a lower cutoff for overweight and obese categories compared to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The present study assessed patients with COPD among different BMI categories according to two BMI classification systems: WHO and Asia-Pacific. Patients with COPD aged 40 years or older from the Korean COPD Subtype Study cohort were selected for evaluation. We enrolled 1,462 patients. Medical history including age, sex, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C), the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were evaluated. Patients were categorized into different BMI groups according to the two BMI classification systems. FEV1 and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) percentage revealed an inverse "U"-shaped pattern as the BMI groups changed from underweight to obese when WHO cutoffs were applied. When Asia-Pacific cutoffs were applied, FEV1 and DLCO (%) exhibited a linearly ascending relationship as the BMI increased, and the percentage of patients in the overweight and obese groups linearly decreased with increasing severity of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria. From the underweight to the overweight groups, SGRQ-C and mMRC had a decreasing relationship in both the WHO and Asia-Pacific classifications. The prevalence of comorbidities in the different BMI groups showed similar trends in both BMI classifications systems. The present study demonstrated that patients with COPD who have a high BMI have better pulmonary function and health-related quality of life and reduced dyspnea symptoms. Furthermore, the Asia-Pacific BMI classification more appropriately reflects the correlation of obesity and disease manifestation in Asian COPD patients than the WHO classification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1356 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 223 16%
Student > Master 104 8%
Student > Postgraduate 79 6%
Other 55 4%
Lecturer 44 3%
Other 124 9%
Unknown 727 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 333 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 109 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 1%
Other 93 7%
Unknown 757 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,499,454
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#239
of 2,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,232
of 328,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#9
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.