↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effect of age and performance on pacing of marathon runners

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Effect of age and performance on pacing of marathon runners
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s141649
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis, Beat Knechtle

Abstract

Pacing strategies in marathon runners have previously been examined, especially with regard to age and performance level separately. However, less information about the age × performance interaction on pacing in age-group runners exists. The aim of the present study was to examine whether runners with similar race time and at different age differ for pacing. Data (women, n=117,595; men, n=180,487) from the "New York City Marathon" between 2006 and 2016 were analyzed. A between-within subjects analysis of variance showed a large main effect of split on race speed (p<0.001, η(2)=0.538) with the fastest speed in the 5-10 km split and the slowest in the 35-40 km. A small sex × split interaction on race speed was found (p<0.001, η(2)=0.035) with men showing larger increase in speed at 5 km and women at 25 km and 40 km (end spurt). An age-group × performance group interaction on Δspeed was shown for both sexes at 5 km, 10 km, 15 km, 20 km, 25 km, 30 km, 35 km, and 40 km (p<0.001, 0.001≤η(2)≤0.004), where athletes in older age-groups presented a relatively more even pace compared with athletes in younger age-groups, a trend that was more remarkable in the relatively slow performance groups. So far, the present study is the first one to observe an age × performance interaction on pacing; ie, older runners pace differently (smaller changes) than younger runners with similar race time. These findings are of great practical interest for coaches working with marathon runners of different age, but similar race time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 19 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 28 50%
Psychology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 20 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,485,210
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#114
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,155
of 317,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them