| Title |
How stable are quantitative sensory testing measurements over time? Report on 10-week reliability and agreement of results in healthy volunteers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s137391 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Nothnagel, Christian Puta, Thomas Lehmann, Philipp Baumbach, Martha B Menard, Brunhild Gabriel, Holger H W Gabriel, Thomas Weiss, Frauke Musial |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,595,726
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#852
of 2,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,918
of 331,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#33
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.