↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Conventional and novel stem cell based therapies for androgenic alopecia

Overview of attention for article published in Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Conventional and novel stem cell based therapies for androgenic alopecia
Published in
Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/sccaa.s138150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dodanim Talavera-Adame, Daniella Newman, Nathan Newman

Abstract

The prevalence of androgenic alopecia (AGA) increases with age and it affects both men and women. Patients diagnosed with AGA may experience decreased quality of life, depression, and feel self-conscious. There are a variety of therapeutic options ranging from prescription drugs to non-prescription medications. Currently, AGA involves an annual global market revenue of US$4 billion and a growth rate of 1.8%, indicating a growing consumer market. Although natural and synthetic ingredients can promote hair growth and, therefore, be useful to treat AGA, some of them have important adverse effects and unknown mechanisms of action that limit their use and benefits. Biologic factors that include signaling from stem cells, dermal papilla cells, and platelet-rich plasma are some of the current therapeutic agents being studied for hair restoration with milder side effects. However, most of the mechanisms exerted by these factors in hair restoration are still being researched. In this review, we analyze the therapeutic agents that have been used for AGA and emphasize the potential of new therapies based on advances in stem cell technologies and regenerative medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 32 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,277,581
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#24
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,834
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.