| Title |
Magnetic field enhanced convective diffusion of iron oxide nanoparticles in an osmotically disrupted cell culture model of the blood–brain barrier
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s62260 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhizhi Sun, Matthew Worden, Yaroslav Wroczynskyj, Vinith Yathindranath, Johan van Lierop, Torsten Hegmann, Donald W Miller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 26% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,492
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,630
of 240,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#48
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.