| Title |
Use of hyaluronic acid fillers for the treatment of the aging face
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s1244 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael H Gold |
| Abstract |
Hyaluronic acid fillers have become popular soft tissue filler augmentation agents over the past several years. They have helped revolutionize the filler market with a number of new products available for use for our patients. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the characteristics of the HA fillers and to review each of the current products currently available for use in the US. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 28% |
| Engineering | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#595,004
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#45
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#887
of 84,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.