| Title |
Duloxetine in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s16358 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle J Ormseth, Beth A Scholz, Chad S Boomershine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 37% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#345,282
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#16
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,190
of 127,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them