↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

New developments in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma – the role of ixazomib

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
New developments in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma – the role of ixazomib
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s102328
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul G Richardson, Shaji Kumar, Jacob P Laubach, Claudia Paba-Prada, Neeraj Gupta, Deborah Berg, Helgi van de Velde, Philippe Moreau

Abstract

Ixazomib is the first oral proteasome inhibitor to be approved, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy. Approval was on the basis of results from the phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM1 study, which demonstrated a 35% improvement in progression-free survival with the all-oral combination of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone alone (median: 20.6 vs 14.7 months; hazard ratio: 0.74, p=0.012; median follow-up 14.7 months). The addition of ixazomib to the lenalidomide-dexamethasone regimen was associated with limited additional toxicity and had no adverse impact on patient-reported quality of life. Common grade ≥3 adverse events with ixazomib include gastrointestinal adverse events, rash, and thrombocytopenia. Here, we review the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and patient-reported quality of life data seen with ixazomib, and discuss the role of this oral agent in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, including in patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and those with multiple prior therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 25 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,552,599
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#137
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,532
of 318,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.