↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Treatment of pulmonary hypertension in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: shortfall in efficacy or trial design?

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of pulmonary hypertension in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: shortfall in efficacy or trial design?
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, July 2014
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s64907
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven D Nathan, Christopher S King

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,816,184
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,445
of 2,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,193
of 242,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#27
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.