↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effects of temperature and fluid media on the scroll width size of the Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) donor graft

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Effects of temperature and fluid media on the scroll width size of the Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) donor graft
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2017
DOI 10.2147/opth.s143427
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen H Koo, Allen O Eghrari, Ryan S Meshkin, Wei Shi, William J Feuer, Karen G DeMarco, Arthur C Kurz

Abstract

Our study was conducted to evaluate whether higher temperature leads to increased - or wider - scroll widths of the Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) donor graft. To investigate the effects of temperature and fluid media on the DMEK donor graft scroll widths. This research work was a laboratory investigation. Baseline cell count was taken via specular microscopy for the donor corneas at room temperature (20°C-25°C). The endothelium sides of the donor corneas were stained with Trypan Blue Solution 0.4% for 30 s, and the Descemet's membranes were stripped. The DMEK donor grafts were placed into three different fluid media - Optisol(®), Balanced Salt Solution (BSS), and BSS PLUS(®) (BSS Plus). The DMEK donor grafts were then transferred into cold temperature (4°C) for 60 min, after which the donor grafts' scroll widths were examined and measured. The donor grafts were then warmed in the incubator and brought to physiological temperature (35°C-37°C), and their scroll widths were examined and measured again. In 30 measurements of ten tissues across three temperature and fluid conditions, the average scroll width measured 1.73 mm, ranging from 1.1 to 2.9 mm. In a mixed linear model, the scroll widths increased with temperature (P=0.02). There was no significant difference in scroll widths among the three solutions (P=0.84, mixed linear model). We observed an increase in DMEK donor graft scroll widths with higher temperatures. The usage of BSS Plus as media solution could also lead to smaller DMEK donor graft scroll widths, compared with BSS, but our study does not establish this.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,551
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,374
of 324,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.