↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Graphic tobacco warning labels – an improper solution?

Overview of attention for article published in Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Graphic tobacco warning labels – an improper solution?
Published in
Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, July 2014
DOI 10.2147/lctt.s68563
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua D Salvi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 8%
Spain 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#61
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,775
of 242,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.