The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Review of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase) in the management of patients with cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2147/btt.s3052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tacjana Pressler |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,034,494
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#16
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,213
of 96,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.