↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Carcinogenicity of chromium and chemoprevention: a brief update

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Carcinogenicity of chromium and chemoprevention: a brief update
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s139262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yafei Wang, Hong Su, Yuanliang Gu, Xin Song, Jinshun Zhao

Abstract

Chromium has two main valence states: hexavalent chromium (Cr[VI]) and trivalent chromium (Cr[III]). Cr(VI), a well-established human carcinogen, can enter cells by way of a sulfate/phosphate anion-transport system, and then be reduced to lower-valence intermediates consisting of pentavalent chromium (Cr[V]), tetravalent chromium (Cr[IV]) or Cr(III) via cellular reductants. These intermediates may directly or indirectly result in DNA damage or DNA-protein cross-links. Although Cr(III) complexes cannot pass easily through cell membranes, they have the ability to accumulate around cells to induce cell-surface morphological alteration and result in cell-membrane lipid injuries via disruption of cellular functions and integrity, and finally to cause DNA damage. In recent years, more research, including in vitro, in vivo, and epidemiological studies, has been conducted to evaluate the genotoxicity/carcinogenicity induced by Cr(VI) and/or Cr(III) compounds. At the same time, various therapeutic agents, especially antioxidants, have been explored through in vitro and in vivo studies for preventing chromium-induced genotoxicity/carcinogenesis. This review aims to provide a brief update on the carcinogenicity of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) and chemoprevention with different antioxidants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 190 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 73 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 22 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Environmental Science 12 6%
Engineering 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 88 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,950,527
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,602
of 3,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,580
of 328,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#53
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.