↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Acute pain management in children

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Acute pain management in children
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, July 2010
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s4554
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan T Verghese, Raafat S Hannallah

Abstract

The greatest advance in pediatric pain medicine is the recognition that untreated pain is a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality after surgical trauma. Accurate assessment of pain in different age groups and the effective treatment of postoperative pain is constantly being refined; with newer drugs being used alone or in combination with other drugs continues to be explored. Several advances in developmental neurobiology and pharmacology, knowledge of new analgesics and newer applications of old analgesics in the last two decades have helped the pediatric anesthesiologist in managing pain in children more efficiently. The latter include administering opioids via the skin and nasal mucosa and their addition into the neuraxial local anesthetics. Systemic opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and regional analgesics alone or combined with additives are currently used to provide effective postoperative analgesia. These modalities are best utilized when combined as a multimodal approach to treat acute pain in the perioperative setting. The development of receptor specific drugs that can produce pain relief without the untoward side effects of respiratory depression will hasten the recovery and discharge of children after surgery. This review focuses on the overview of acute pain management in children, with an emphasis on pharmacological and regional anesthesia in achieving this goal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 244 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Student > Postgraduate 27 11%
Researcher 24 10%
Other 17 7%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 50 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 56 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,451,351
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#479
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,507
of 104,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.