↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cannabinoids in the management of difficult to treat pain

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,325)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
690 Mendeley
Title
Cannabinoids in the management of difficult to treat pain
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2008
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s1928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ethan B Russo

Abstract

This article reviews recent research on cannabinoid analgesia via the endocannabinoid system and non-receptor mechanisms, as well as randomized clinical trials employing cannabinoids in pain treatment. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, Marinol((R))) and nabilone (Cesamet((R))) are currently approved in the United States and other countries, but not for pain indications. Other synthetic cannabinoids, such as ajulemic acid, are in development. Crude herbal cannabis remains illegal in most jurisdictions but is also under investigation. Sativex((R)), a cannabis derived oromucosal spray containing equal proportions of THC (partial CB(1) receptor agonist ) and cannabidiol (CBD, a non-euphoriant, anti-inflammatory analgesic with CB(1) receptor antagonist and endocannabinoid modulating effects) was approved in Canada in 2005 for treatment of central neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis, and in 2007 for intractable cancer pain. Numerous randomized clinical trials have demonstrated safety and efficacy for Sativex in central and peripheral neuropathic pain, rheumatoid arthritis and cancer pain. An Investigational New Drug application to conduct advanced clinical trials for cancer pain was approved by the US FDA in January 2006. Cannabinoid analgesics have generally been well tolerated in clinical trials with acceptable adverse event profiles. Their adjunctive addition to the pharmacological armamentarium for treatment of pain shows great promise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 188 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 690 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 674 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 96 14%
Researcher 95 14%
Student > Master 87 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 11%
Other 57 8%
Other 124 18%
Unknown 154 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 62 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 6%
Neuroscience 30 4%
Other 144 21%
Unknown 178 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 954. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,832
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#2
of 1,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15
of 175,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.