| Title |
Size-dependent accumulation of particles in lysosomes modulates dendritic cell function through impaired antigen degradation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s64353 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emilie Seydoux, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser, Izabela M Nita, Sandor Balog, Amiq Gazdhar, Philip A Stumbles, Alke Petri-Fink, Fabian Blank, Christophe von Garnier |
| Abstract |
Nanosized particles may enable therapeutic modulation of immune responses by targeting dendritic cell (DC) networks in accessible organs such as the lung. To date, however, the effects of nanoparticles on DC function and downstream immune responses remain poorly understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,655,938
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#113
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,024
of 240,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.