↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

EGFR with TKI-sensitive mutations in exon 19 is highly expressed and frequently detected in Chinese patients with lung squamous carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
EGFR with TKI-sensitive mutations in exon 19 is highly expressed and frequently detected in Chinese patients with lung squamous carcinoma
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, September 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s130051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aadil Ahmed Memon, Haiping Zhang, Ye Gu, Qian Luo, Jiajun Shi, Zixin Deng, Jian Ma, Wei Ma

Abstract

Recently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been recommended as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), significantly improving the treatment outcomes of lung adenocarcinoma patients with the EGFR mutation. However, the application of TKIs for lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), the second largest pathological subtype of NSCLC, remains controversial because available data for the EGFR mutation profile and frequency in SCC patients are limited. In this study, 89 bronchoscopic-biopsy specimens from Chinese SCC male patients were assayed for EGFR exon 19 mutation, using improved polymerase chain reaction-denature gel gradient electrophoresis. EGFR exon 19 mutations were detected in 77 of 89 (86.5%) patients, and included six kinds of point mutations (11.6%) and two deletions (Del_747-751 [64.9%] and Del_746-751 [23.3%]). We found that the proportion of mutated EGFR varied from 0.98% to 100% in positive specimens and increased with the development of the disease. The difference of proportion between Stage IV patients and Stage II patients or Stage III patients was significant (P<0.001). These results provided valuable clues to explain the reason why patients harboring the same mutation responded distinctly to TKI treatment. Del_747-751 and Del_746-751 were the dominant mutations in the assayed SCC patients (76.4%), and both belong to the EGFR-TKI-sensitive mutation. Recently research demonstrated that Del_746-751 patients have better response to EGFR-TKI than Del_L747-751 patients. However, our study indicated that majority of SCC patients (55.5%) carried Del_ L747-751. We suggest that the unique clinic features of SCC should be further studied to reveal the mechanism of poorer treatment outcome of EGFR-TKI therapy, and that a better treatment plan and more specific, potent targeted drugs for lung SCC need to be developed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Professor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#2,078
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,752
of 324,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#66
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.