| Title |
Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire Thai version
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s67842 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Punjaporn Waleeprakhon, Pichai Ittasakul, Manote Lotrakul, Pattarabhorn Wisajun, Sudawan Jullagate, Terence A Ketter |
| Abstract |
The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) has been translated to many languages and has been used in many countries as a screening instrument for bipolar disorder. The main objective of this study was to evaluate validity of the Thai version of the MDQ as a screening instrument for bipolar disorder in a psychiatric outpatient sample, and to determine its optimum question #1 item threshold value for bipolar disorder. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 25% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,598,118
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#848
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,595
of 240,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#18
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.