↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Substance use disorders in military veterans: prevalence and treatment challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Substance use disorders in military veterans: prevalence and treatment challenges
Published in
Substance abuse and rehabilitation, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/sar.s116720
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenni B Teeters, Cynthia L Lancaster, Delisa G Brown, Sudie E Back

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are a significant problem among our nation's military veterans. In the following overview, we provide information on the prevalence of SUDs among military veterans, clinical characteristics of SUDs, options for screening and evidence-based treatment, as well as relevant treatment challenges. Among psychotherapeutic approaches, behavioral interventions for the management of SUDs typically involve short-term, cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions. These interventions focus on the identification and modification of maladaptive thoughts and behaviors associated with increased craving, use, or relapse to substances. Additionally, client-centered motivational interviewing approaches focus on increasing motivation to engage in treatment and reduce substance use. A variety of pharmacotherapies have received some support in the management of SUDs, primarily to help with the reduction of craving or withdrawal symptoms. Currently approved medications as well as treatment challenges are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 14%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 69 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Social Sciences 24 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 86 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#411,639
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#11
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,649
of 328,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them