| Title |
Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis – epidemiology and management approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s53168 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward J Oberle, Julia G Harris, James W Verbsky |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 17% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#255,031
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#14
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,307
of 269,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them