↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Managing acute abdominal pain in pediatric patients: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Managing acute abdominal pain in pediatric patients: current perspectives
Published in
Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/phmt.s120156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadia M Hijaz, Craig A Friesen

Abstract

Acute abdominal pain in pediatric patients has been a challenge for providers because of the nonspecific nature of symptoms and difficulty in the assessment and physical examination in children. Although most children with acute abdominal pain have self-limited benign conditions, pain may be a manifestation of an urgent surgical or medical condition where the biggest challenge is making a timely diagnosis so that appropriate treatment can be initiated without any diagnostic delays that increase morbidity. This is weighed against the need to decrease radiation exposure and avoid unnecessary operations. Across all age groups, there are numerous conditions that present with abdominal pain ranging from a very simple viral illness to a life-threatening surgical condition. It is proposed that the history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging studies should initially be directed at differentiating surgical versus nonsurgical conditions both categorized as urgent versus nonurgent. The features of the history including patient's age, physical examination focused toward serious conditions, and appropriate tests are highlighted in the context of making these differentiations. Initial testing and management is also discussed with an emphasis on making use of surgeon and radiologist consultation and the need for adequate follow-up and reevaluation of the patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Other 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Master 6 5%
Researcher 6 5%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 55 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 55 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2022.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#78
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,873
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.