↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Spotlight on eluxadoline for the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 307)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Spotlight on eluxadoline for the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, September 2017
DOI 10.2147/ceg.s123621
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konstantinos C Fragkos

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) has limited options for treatment currently, including mainly anti-motility medications, antispasmodics, and antidepressants. This review discusses the properties of a new drug, eluxadoline, a gut-targeting mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonist and a delta-opioid receptor antagonist, and its efficacy and safety in patients with IBS-D. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify studies that had investigated eluxadoline as a treatment in IBS-D. A narrative review of other information is provided with respect to pharmacological and chemical properties. Where suitable, meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model to produce a pooled estimate. Eluxadoline showed efficacy improving stool consistency (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.29 at 12 weeks, p = 0.0004; -0.46 at 26 weeks, p = 0.0001), global symptoms (SMD: -0.15 at 12 weeks, p = 0.006; -0.14 at 26 weeks, p = 0.02), quality of life (SMD: 0.21 at 12 weeks, p < 0.0001; 0.16 at 26 weeks, p = 0.007), pain (SMD: -0.17 at 12 weeks, p = 0.001; -0.16 at 26 weeks, p = 0.01), and adequate relief (odds ratio [OR]: 1.99 at 12 weeks, p < 0.00001; 1.78 at 26 weeks, p < 0.0001). It also improved IBS severity and other abdominal symptoms such as bloating, discomfort, and risk of urgency and fecal incontinence. Its main side effects included constipation (OR: 3.49, p < 0.00001), vomiting (OR: 3.42, p = 0.0002), abdominal pain (OR: 1.78, p = 0.007), and nausea (OR: 1.42, p = 0.07). The overall quality of trials was satisfactory with the meta-analyses providing largely homogeneous outcomes. Eluxadoline's place in clinical practice might prove useful since the pharmacological options of IBS-D are limited and eluxadoline showed a positive effect in treating the symptoms of IBS-D.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Other 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 21%
Chemistry 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,978,693
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#30
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,701
of 315,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them