↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

AKT inhibition is an effective treatment strategy in ARID1A-deficient gastric cancer cells

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
AKT inhibition is an effective treatment strategy in ARID1A-deficient gastric cancer cells
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s139664
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dakeun Lee, Eun Ji Yu, In-Hye Ham, Hoon Hur, You-Sun Kim

Abstract

The At-rich interactive domain 1A (ARID1A) is frequently mutated in gastric cancers (GCs) with a poor prognosis. Growing evidence indicates that loss of ARID1A expression leads to activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway by AKT phosphorylation. We aim to investigate the different sensitivity for the AKT inhibitor in ARID1A-deficient GC cells. After transfection using siRNA or shRNA, the effect of ARID1A knockdown on the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway was evaluated by Western blot analysis. ARID1A-knockdown cells were treated with AKT inhibitor (GSK690693), 5-fluorouracil, or cisplatin, alone or in combination. Viability and apoptosis were analyzed using EZ-CYTOX cell viability assay and flow cytometry, respectively. ARID1A depletion accelerated the phosphorylation of AKT and S6 in a dose-dependent manner and led to an increased proliferation of MKN-1, MKN-28, and KATO-III GC cells (P<0.001). ARID1A-deficient cells were more vulnerable to GSK690693 in comparison to the controls (P<0.001), even at very low doses. Flow cytometry confirmed the increased apoptosis in ARID1A-deficient cells treated with GSK690693 (0.01 μmol/L; P<0.001). In contrast to our expectations, ARID1A depletion did not cause resistance to 5-fluorouracil or cisplatin. Addition of GSK690693 to the conventional chemotherapy induced more decreased cell viability in ARID1A-knockdown cells (P<0.01). Loss of ARID1A expression is a surrogate marker for the activation of the AKT signaling pathway and is also a reliable biomarker to predict the response for the AKT inhibitor. We anticipate that appropriate patient selection based on ARID1A expression in the tumor tissue will increase the drug sensitivity for the AKT inhibition and improve the clinical outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Chemistry 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#984
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,361
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#32
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.