↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Ultrasound-guided methotrexate injection for De Quervain disease of the wrist: what lies beyond the horizon?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound-guided methotrexate injection for De Quervain disease of the wrist: what lies beyond the horizon?
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, September 2017
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s143256
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdallah El-Sayed Allam, Doaa Shawky Al-Ashkar, Ahmed A Negm, Basma Aly Eltawab, Wei-Ting Wu, Ke-Vin Chang

Abstract

De Quervain disease (DQVD) is one of the most common causes of lateral wrist pain and can lead to significant disability. The current case involves a right-handed, middle-aged, female patient with severe lateral wrist pain due to DQVD. Her pain was not responsive to oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, rehabilitation, and repeated corticosteroid injections. Because she refused surgical intervention, we performed ultrasound-guided methotrexate injections (four times). After the injections, dramatic pain relief, functional improvement, and reduction of the thickness of the retinaculum and tendons in the first dorsal extensor compartment of the wrist were noted. This case report highlights the potential usefulness of ultrasound-guided methotrexate injection for recalcitrant DQVD of the wrist.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 20%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,617,324
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#479
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,198
of 324,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#19
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.