↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A systematic identification of species-specific protein succinylation sites using joint element features information

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
A systematic identification of species-specific protein succinylation sites using joint element features information
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s140875
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehedi Hasan, Mst Shamima Khatun, Nurul Haque Mollah, Cao Yong, Dianjing Guo

Abstract

Lysine succinylation, an important type of protein posttranslational modification, plays significant roles in many cellular processes. Accurate identification of succinylation sites can facilitate our understanding about the molecular mechanism and potential roles of lysine succinylation. However, even in well-studied systems, a majority of the succinylation sites remain undetected because the traditional experimental approaches to succinylation site identification are often costly, time-consuming, and laborious. In silico approach, on the other hand, is potentially an alternative strategy to predict succinylation substrates. In this paper, a novel computational predictor SuccinSite2.0 was developed for predicting generic and species-specific protein succinylation sites. This predictor takes the composition of profile-based amino acid and orthogonal binary features, which were used to train a random forest classifier. We demonstrated that the proposed SuccinSite2.0 predictor outperformed other currently existing implementations on a complementarily independent dataset. Furthermore, the important features that make visible contributions to species-specific and cross-species-specific prediction of protein succinylation site were analyzed. The proposed predictor is anticipated to be a useful computational resource for lysine succinylation site prediction. The integrated species-specific online tool of SuccinSite2.0 is publicly accessible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Computer Science 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,605,790
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,525
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,898
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#35
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.