↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

In silico predictive model to determine vector-mediated transport properties for the blood–brain barrier choline transporter

Overview of attention for article published in Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
In silico predictive model to determine vector-mediated transport properties for the blood–brain barrier choline transporter
Published in
Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC, September 2014
DOI 10.2147/aabc.s63749
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergey Shityakov, Carola Förster

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier choline transporter (BBB-ChT) may have utility as a drug delivery vector to the central nervous system (CNS). We therefore initiated molecular docking studies with the AutoDock and AutoDock Vina (ADVina) algorithms to develop predictive models for compound screening and to identify structural features important for binding to this transporter. The binding energy predictions were highly correlated with r(2) =0.88, F=692.4, standard error of estimate =0.775, and P-value<0.0001 for selected BBB-ChT-active/inactive compounds (n=93). Both programs were able to cluster active (Gibbs free energy of binding <-6.0 kcal*mol(-1)) and inactive (Gibbs free energy of binding >-6.0 kcal*mol(-1)) molecules and dock them significantly better than at random with an area under the curve value of 0.86 and 0.84, respectively. In ranking smaller molecules with few torsional bonds, a size-related bias in scoring producing false-negative outcomes was detected. Finally, important blood-brain barrier parameters, such as the logBBpassive and logBBactive values, were assessed to predict compound transport to the CNS accurately. Knowledge gained from this study is useful to better understand the binding requirements in BBB-ChT, and until such time as its crystal structure becomes available, it may have significant utility in developing a highly predictive model for the rational design of drug-like compounds targeted to the brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 177 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 56 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 22 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 71 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC
#7
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,544
of 248,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them