↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Drug tendering: drug supply and shortage implications for the uptake of biosimilars

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 524)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Drug tendering: drug supply and shortage implications for the uptake of biosimilars
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2017
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s140063
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Dranitsaris, Ira Jacobs, Carol Kirchhoff, Robert Popovian, Lesley G Shane

Abstract

Due to the continued increase in global spending on health care, payers have introduced a number of programs, policies, and agreements on pharmaceutical pricing in order to control costs. While incentives to increase generic drug use have achieved significant savings, other cost-containment measures are required. Tendering is a formal procedure to purchase medications using competitive bidding for a particular contract. Although useful for cost containment, tendering can lead to decreased competition in a given market. Consequently, drug shortages can occur, resulting in changes to treatment plans to products that may have lower efficacy and/or an increased risk of adverse effects. Therefore, care must be taken to ensure that tendering does not negatively impact patient care or the health care system. A large and expanding portion of total pharmaceutical expenditure is for biologic therapies. These agents have revolutionized the treatment of many diseases, including cancer and inflammatory conditions; however, patient access to biologic drugs can be limited due to availability, insurance coverage, and cost. As branded biologic therapies reach the end of patent- and data-protection periods, biosimilars are being approved as lower-cost alternatives. Biosimilars are products that are highly similar to the originator product with no clinically meaningful differences in terms of safety, purity, or potency. As more biosimilars receive regulatory approval and adoption increases, these therapies are expected to have an impact on global health care spending and should result in overall savings. However, the use of tendering to maximize the potential benefits of biosimilars has varied across the world. Therefore, the objectives of this review are to examine the drug-tendering process and its implications on drug supply and drug shortages, as well as to describe biosimilars and how tendering may influence their uptake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 54 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 8%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 61 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,393,709
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#36
of 524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,221
of 325,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.