| Title |
Digital health technology for use in patients with serious mental illness: a systematic review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/mder.s144158 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonal Batra, Ross A Baker, Tao Wang, Felicia Forma, Faith DiBiasi, Timothy Peters-Strickland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 369 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 114 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 57 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 25 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 17% |
| Unknown | 128 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,891,909
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#39
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,627
of 334,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.