@BaumbergOwl @dokhollidays Siehe auch: https://t.co/lRFN5ogY9a

@UtterBullshit29 @VikiLovesFACS @bsicongress This graph is miscarriage following vaccination, not miscarriage incidence. Obviously with millions more vaccine administrations than other years there will be more reports of miscarriages, a relatively common e

@mcfunny @BenSwann_ It’s likely genuine, but a result of much greater attention on vaccine + vaers and far greater doses. Same happened with HPV vax. https://t.co/SDb3ei1uPE

@drquackquack82 Widespread attention on VAERS, a form of Weber effect. More ppl taking it too https://t.co/omW75MnErd Your graph shows it's already falling & probs will continue despite ongoing vaccination. Same happened w/ HPV vax in 2006, spiked th

@kramer_holly @kidney_boy "In 1984, Weber postulated that AE reporting of a drug peaks in the second year after its approval and subsequently declines... based upon [his] analysis of AE reporting patterns of 7 NSAIDs." https://t.co/uaGHmASc8k Can't find

@pejan31662627 @kotyzap @R_Bartonicek https://t.co/Vkr5xveRuK

<自分用メモ> 副作用報告におけるバイアス Weber effect (ウェーバー効果)に関して検証された論文 https://t.co/PinaiHNJzn

こちらのページも「ウェーバー効果」に相当する現象は見らななかったという結論なよう。著者は違うが、同じFDAのデータを使っている模様。ウェーバー効果論者、大丈夫か。 https://t.co/4brGea7ZOl