↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Implementation of an electronic surgical referral service. Collaboration, consensus and cost of the surgeon – general practitioner Delphi approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of an electronic surgical referral service. Collaboration, consensus and cost of the surgeon – general practitioner Delphi approach
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, September 2014
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s66693
Pubmed ID
Authors

Knut Magne Augestad, Arthur Revhaug, Roar Johnsen, Stein-Olav Skrøvseth, Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo

Abstract

Poor coordination between levels of care plays a central role in determining the quality and cost of health care. To improve patient coordination, systematic structures, guidelines, and processes for creating, transferring, and recognizing information are needed to facilitate referral routines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Engineering 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#900
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,027
of 248,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.