The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Implementation of an electronic surgical referral service. Collaboration, consensus and cost of the surgeon – general practitioner Delphi approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s66693 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Knut Magne Augestad, Arthur Revhaug, Roar Johnsen, Stein-Olav Skrøvseth, Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo |
Abstract |
Poor coordination between levels of care plays a central role in determining the quality and cost of health care. To improve patient coordination, systematic structures, guidelines, and processes for creating, transferring, and recognizing information are needed to facilitate referral routines. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
Researcher | 5 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Engineering | 4 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#900
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,027
of 248,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.