↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cat amniotic membrane multipotent cells are nontumorigenic and are safe for use in cell transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Cat amniotic membrane multipotent cells are nontumorigenic and are safe for use in cell transplantation
Published in
Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, August 2014
DOI 10.2147/sccaa.s67790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atanasio S Vidane, Aline F Souza, Rafael V Sampaio, Fabiana F Bressan, Naira C Pieri, Daniele S Martins, Flavio V Meirelles, Maria A Miglino, Carlos E Ambrósio

Abstract

Amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs) are multipotent cells with an enhanced ability to differentiate into multiple lineages. AMSCs can be acquired through noninvasive methods, and therefore are exempt from the typical ethical issues surrounding stem cell use. The objective of this study was to isolate and characterize AMSCs from a cat amniotic membrane for future application in regenerative medicine. The cat AMSCs were harvested after mechanical and enzymatic digestion of amnion. In culture medium, the cat AMSCs adhered to a plastic culture dish and displayed a fibroblast-like morphology. Immunophenotyping assays were positive for the mesenchymal stem cell-specific markers CD73 and CD90 but not the hematopoietic markers CD34, CD45, and CD79. Under appropriate conditions, the cat AMSCs differentiated into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic cell lineages. One advantage of cat AMSCs was nonteratogenicity, assessed 4 weeks post injection of undifferentiated AMSCs into immunodeficient mice. These findings suggest that cat amniotic membranes may be an important and useful source of mesenchymal stem cells for clinical applications, especially for cell or tissue replacement in chronic and degenerative diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2014.
All research outputs
#22,986,241
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#64
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,651
of 240,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them