↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Navigating the “liberation procedure”: a qualitative study of motivating and hesitating factors among people with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Navigating the “liberation procedure”: a qualitative study of motivating and hesitating factors among people with multiple sclerosis
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, September 2014
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s65483
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Ploughman, Chelsea Harris, Stephen H Hogan, Cynthia Murray, Michelle Murdoch, Mark W Austin, Mark Stefanelli

Abstract

The debate within the multiple sclerosis (MS) community initiated by the chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) hypothesis and the subsequent liberation procedure placed some people with MS at odds with health care professionals and researchers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Psychology 5 13%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,701,400
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#231
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,303
of 248,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.