↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Factors influencing pacing in triathlon

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Factors influencing pacing in triathlon
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s44392
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam SX Wu, Jeremiah J Peiffer, Jeanick Brisswalter, Kazunori Nosaka, Chris R Abbiss

Abstract

Triathlon is a multisport event consisting of sequential swim, cycle, and run disciplines performed over a variety of distances. This complex and unique sport requires athletes to appropriately distribute their speed or energy expenditure (ie, pacing) within each discipline as well as over the entire event. As with most physical activity, the regulation of pacing in triathlon may be influenced by a multitude of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The majority of current research focuses mainly on the Olympic distance, whilst much less literature is available on other triathlon distances such as the sprint, half-Ironman, and Ironman distances. Furthermore, little is understood regarding the specific physiological, environmental, and interdisciplinary effects on pacing. Therefore, this article discusses the pacing strategies observed in triathlon across different distances, and elucidates the possible factors influencing pacing within the three specific disciplines of a triathlon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 46 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 77 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 55 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,202,382
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#127
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,724
of 237,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.