↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Perceived parenting and social support: can they predict academic achievement in Argentinean college students?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Perceived parenting and social support: can they predict academic achievement in Argentinean college students?
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, September 2014
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s68566
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guadalupe de la Iglesia, Agustin Freiberg Hoffmann, Mercedes Fernández Liporace

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the ability to predict academic achievement through the perception of parenting and social support in a sample of 354 Argentinean college students. Their mean age was 23.50 years (standard deviation =2.62 years) and most of them (83.3%) were females. As a prerequisite for admission to college, students are required to pass a series of mandatory core classes and are expected to complete them in two semesters. Delay in completing the curriculum is considered low academic achievement. Parenting was assessed taking into account the mother and the father and considering two dimensions: responsiveness and demandingness. Perceived social support was analyzed considering four sources: parents, teachers, classmates, and best friend or boyfriend/girlfriend. Path analysis showed that, as hypothesized, responsiveness had a positive indirect effect on the perception of social support and enhanced achievement. Demandingness had a different effect in the case of the mother as compared to the father. In the mother model, demandingness had a positive direct effect on achievement. In the case of the father, however, the effect of demandingness had a negative and indirect impact on the perception of social support. Teachers were the only source of perceived social support that significantly predicted achievement. The pathway that belongs to teachers as a source of support was positive and direct. Implications for possible interventions are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 24%
Social Sciences 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,018
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#472
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,012
of 237,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.