↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prostate MRI prior to radical prostatectomy: effects on nerve sparing and pathological margin status

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Reports in Urology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Prostate MRI prior to radical prostatectomy: effects on nerve sparing and pathological margin status
Published in
Research and Reports in Urology, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/rru.s128499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sasha C Druskin, Jen-Jane Liu, Allen Young, Zhaoyong Feng, Seyed S Dianat, Wesley W Ludwig, Bruce J Trock, Katarzyna J Macura, Christian P Pavlovich

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the positive surgical margin (PSM) and nerve sparing (NS) rates in patients who underwent prostate MRI (pMRI) prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) and compare them with matched, nonimaged control RP patients. We identified 204 men who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI (pelMRI), of whom 176 (86.3%) underwent pMRIs, within 60 days of RP, and compared them (1:1) with a nonim-aged control group matched by surgeon, age, race, body mass index (BMI), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), pathological Gleason score, prostate specimen weight, and RP year. The rates of nonfocal extracapsular extension (nfECE) on RP pathology in the MRI and control groups were similar. PSM rates were lower in the MRI group (13.7% vs 19.3%; P=0.14), but the difference did not meet statistical significance; this was also the case in patients with nfECE on RP pathology (27.7% vs 39.5%; P=0.3). NS rates were similar between groups. In the MRI group, 54 (26.5%) patients had an MRI suspicious for nfECE; their PSM rate (20.4%) was higher than that of patients with an MRI not suspicious for nfECE (11.3%; P=0.11), but the difference lacked statistical significance; the former group had significantly lower rates of NS. Limitations of the study include sample power and nonuniform heeding of MRI results by each surgeon. MRI did not significantly decrease the rates of PSM, including in the subset of patients with nfECE on final pathology. Even wider resection may be necessary in patients with MRIs suggesting locally-advanced disease. Studies with greater power are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 65%
Psychology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,029,427
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Urology
#74
of 228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,257
of 309,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Urology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.