| Title |
More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s67431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha Fashler, Joel Katz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#701,503
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#96
of 1,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,637
of 237,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.