↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Managing resistant hypertension: focus on mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Managing resistant hypertension: focus on mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, October 2017
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s138599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Carlos Yugar-Toledo, Rodrigo Modolo, Ana Paula de Faria, Heitor Moreno

Abstract

Mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists (MRAs) have proven to be effective in some types of hypertension, especially in resistant hypertension (RHTN). In this phenotype of hypertension, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway plays an important role, with MRAs being especially effective in reducing blood pressure. In this review, we show the relevance of aldosterone in RHTN, as well as some clinical characteristics of this condition and the main concepts involving its pathophysiology and cardiovascular damage. We analyzed the mechanisms of action and clinical effects of two current MRAs - spironolactone and eplerenone - both of which are useful in RHTN, with special attention to the former. RHTN represents a significant minority (10%-15%) of hypertension cases. However, primary-care physicians, cardiologists, nephrologists, neurologists, and geriatricians face this health problem on a daily basis. MRAs are likely one of the best pharmacological options in RHTN patients; however, they are still underused.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,481,888
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#509
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,844
of 322,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.