↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Long-term safety and efficacy of romiplostim for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 292)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Long-term safety and efficacy of romiplostim for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s80646
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prakash Vishnu, David M Aboulafia

Abstract

Inhibition of platelet production and mediated by antiplatelet antibodies is a well-known mechanism causing low platelet counts in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists increases platelet counts and decreases the risk of bleeding in patients with ITP. Two such thrombopoietin receptor agonists, romiplostim and eltrombopag, are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat thrombocytopenia in adults, and most recently, children with persistent or chronic ITP. This review focuses on the efficacy data and safety analysis of the pooled data from the clinical trials evaluating romiplostim for treatment of adults with ITP. The rates of hemorrhage, thrombosis, hematologic and nonhematologic cancers, and myelodysplastic syndrome were not overrepresented among the groups who received romiplostim versus placebo or other standard-of-care treatments. Yet, as after-market experience with thrombopoietin receptor agonists increases, there are emerging reports of increased incidence of thrombosis and bone marrow reticulin among patients who are treated with long-term use of these agents. Ongoing clinical research will continue to evaluate romiplostim's efficacy and safety in other primary and secondary thrombocytopenic states.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Postgraduate 8 18%
Other 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,221,301
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#44
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,652
of 298,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.