| Title |
Pain management, prescription opioid mortality, and the CDC: is the devil in the data?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s153322 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael E Schatman, Stephen J Ziegler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 669 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 355 | 53% |
| Canada | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 3 | <1% |
| Georgia | 3 | <1% |
| Central African Republic | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 592 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 6% |
| Scientists | 17 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 541. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#46,297
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#3
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#908
of 332,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.