↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Identification of a novel CACNA1A mutation in a Chinese family with autosomal recessive progressive myoclonic epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Identification of a novel CACNA1A mutation in a Chinese family with autosomal recessive progressive myoclonic epilepsy
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2017
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s145774
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yudan Lv, Zan Wang, Chang Liu, Li Cui

Abstract

Progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder, which is commonly manifested with refractory seizures and neurologic deterioration. The prognosis of PME is poor, so early diagnosis of PME is critical. The aim of our study is to identify the novel pathogenic gene in a Chinese family with PME, which may be helpful in future. A three-generation consanguineous Chinese Han family with PME was recruited. A novel homozygous variant was identified by the genetic technique of exome sequencing and certificated by Sanger sequencing and functional prediction. A novel homozygous variant, c.6975_6976insCAG, in the CACNA1A was identified in the PME family. The novel variant encoding the alpha-1A subunit of the calcium channel Cav2.1 was found in two siblings in the Chinese family and was absent in 50 normal controls. Our research indicates that the homozygous c.6975_6976insCAG might be the pathogenic mutation for PME. As a molecular diagnostic strategy, our research explores the mutation gene spectrum of PME and has resulted in significant predictions for genetic counseling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 38%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Neuroscience 5 19%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,899,670
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,029
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,440
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#21
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.