↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Efficacy of the combined use of a mild foaming cleanser and moisturizer for the care of infant skin

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of the combined use of a mild foaming cleanser and moisturizer for the care of infant skin
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2017
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s140716
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoko Okamoto, Kaori Umehara, Junko Sonoda, Mitsuyuki Hotta, Hiroki Mizushima, Yutaka Takagi, Keiko Matsuo, Naoko Baba

Abstract

Despite the application of skin care treatments, many infants have skin problems such as dryness and erythema. We proposed a new combination skin care for infants which consisted of a foaming cleanser with lower surfactant activity and moisturizers that contained pseudo-ceramide. A total of 50 infants (age: 3-24 months) with insignificant levels of dry skin were enrolled in this usage trial. The parents washed the infants with the test cleanser while bathing and then applied the moisturizer (lotion or cream) containing pseudo-ceramide. Prior to and following the 4-week usage period, visual evaluation of the skin condition was conducted by a dermatologist, in addition to instrumental analysis. Erythema and papule, accompanied by dryness, were commonly observed at week 0. However, by week 4, these symptoms significantly improved; the condition of none of the subjects deteriorated. The number of infants with lower cutaneous barrier function and higher skin pH decreased. The parents of the infants recognized improvements in the skin symptoms and were appreciative of the test materials. The combined usage of the foaming cleanser with lower surfactant activity and a moisturizer containing pseudo-ceramide may be effective in maintaining healthy infant skin and ameliorating the skin symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 28%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Chemistry 2 11%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2017.
All research outputs
#16,584,977
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#523
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,122
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.